Tannen v. Hammerstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tannen v. Hammerstein

217 A.D.2d 694, 630 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 31, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 694 (Tannen v. Hammerstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tannen v. Hammerstein, 217 A.D.2d 694, 630 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to enforce a [695]*695judgment by confession, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated October 22, 1993, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a prior restraining order on certain moneys in the defendant’s bank account and directed that the moneys be released to the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Since the defendant’s attack on the parties’ settlement and judgment by confession has been finally decided (see, Matter of Rosenhain, 193 AD2d 903), enforcement of the judgment by confession by release of certain moneys in the defendant’s bank account was proper. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to enforce a [695]*695judgment by confession, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated October 22, 1993, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a prior restraining order on certain moneys in the defendant’s bank account and directed that the moneys be released to the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Since the defendant’s attack on the parties’ settlement and judgment by confession has been finally decided (see, Matter of Rosenhain, 193 AD2d 903), enforcement of the judgment by confession by release of certain moneys in the defendant’s bank account was proper. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 694, 630 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tannen-v-hammerstein-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack