Tannahill v. Johnson
This text of 62 P. 1116 (Tannahill v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This proceeding is similar in all respects to that in the case of Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 283 (decided by this court at the present term), 62 Pac. 680, and is in the same condition in all respects. What we said in the last-named case applies here, and is decisive of this appeal, for which reasons the judgment appealed from is reversed, and this proceeding remanded to the district court, with directions to proceed herein in the same manner in all respects as directed in the opinion in the case of Ponting v. Isaman, supra. Costs of appeal awarded to appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 P. 1116, 7 Idaho 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tannahill-v-johnson-idaho-1900.