Tannahill v. Black

Idaho Supreme Court

Tannahill v. Black

62 P. 1116, 7 Idaho 290, 1900 Ida. LEXIS 57

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tannahill v. Black. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Idaho 598 →

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided October 22, 1900·Published

Opinion

Per CURIAM.

This proceeding is similar in all respects to that in the case of Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 279 (decided by [291]*291this court at the present term), 62 Pac. 680, and is in tbe same condition in all respects. What we said in the last-named case applies here, and is decisive of this appeal, for which reasons the judgment appealed from is reversed, and this proceeding remanded to the district court, with directions to proceed herein in the same manner in all respects as directed in the opinion in the ease of Ponting v. Isaman, supra. Costs of appeal awarded to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per CURIAM.

This proceeding is similar in all respects to that in the case of Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 279 (decided by [291]*291this court at the present term), 62 Pac. 680, and is in tbe same condition in all respects. What we said in the last-named case applies here, and is decisive of this appeal, for which reasons the judgment appealed from is reversed, and this proceeding remanded to the district court, with directions to proceed herein in the same manner in all respects as directed in the opinion in the ease of Ponting v. Isaman, supra. Costs of appeal awarded to appellant.

Tannahill v. Black, 62 P. 1116, 7 Idaho 290, 1900 Ida. LEXIS 57 (Idaho 1900).

Pincite

62 P. 1116 (Tannahill v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related