Tannahill v. Black

62 P. 1116, 7 Idaho 290, 1900 Ida. LEXIS 57
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 22, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 62 P. 1116 (Tannahill v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tannahill v. Black, 62 P. 1116, 7 Idaho 290, 1900 Ida. LEXIS 57 (Idaho 1900).

Opinion

Per CURIAM.

This proceeding is similar in all respects to that in the case of Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 279 (decided by [291]*291this court at the present term), 62 Pac. 680, and is in tbe same condition in all respects. What we said in the last-named case applies here, and is decisive of this appeal, for which reasons the judgment appealed from is reversed, and this proceeding remanded to the district court, with directions to proceed herein in the same manner in all respects as directed in the opinion in the ease of Ponting v. Isaman, supra. Costs of appeal awarded to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ponting v. Isaman
62 P. 680 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 P. 1116, 7 Idaho 290, 1900 Ida. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tannahill-v-black-idaho-1900.