Tankins v. State

710 S.W.2d 354, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3926
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 1986·No. No. 50330·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after denial of his Rule 27.26 motions without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tankins v. State, 710 S.W.2d 354, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3926 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

710 S.W.2d 354 (Tankins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.