Tankard v. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor

215 F.2d 101, 26 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 68,627
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 11, 1954
Docket13766_1
StatusPublished

This text of 215 F.2d 101 (Tankard v. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tankard v. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, 215 F.2d 101, 26 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 68,627 (9th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The ultimate question on this appeal is whether Tankard’s employees come within Section 16(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, c. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq., as amended in 1949 by c. 736, 63 Stat. 910, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. as to payment for overtime. That question turns upon whether Tankard knew or in reason should have known that a substantial quantity of scrap metal and paper sold by Tankard locally was purchased for and was shipped in interstate commerce. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall, 317 U.S. 88, 63 S.Ct. 125, 87 L.Ed. 83; Culver v. Bell & Loffland, 9 Cir., 146 F.2d 29.

There is ample evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding in the affirmative on the latter question.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall
317 U.S. 88 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Culver v. Bell & Loffland, Inc.
146 F.2d 29 (Ninth Circuit, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 F.2d 101, 26 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 68,627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tankard-v-mitchell-secretary-of-labor-ca9-1954.