Tanisha Thompson v. Ridgecrest
This text of Tanisha Thompson v. Ridgecrest (Tanisha Thompson v. Ridgecrest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered April 3, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01685-CV
TANISHA THOMPSON, Appellant
V.
RIDGECREST, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-06172-E
ORDER The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated January 18, 2014, we
informed appellant that the Court Reporter had notified us the reporter’s record had not been
filed because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to
pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification she had
requested the record and had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or had been
found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to
provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the appeal being ordered
submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provided the required
documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s record. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellant’s
brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tanisha Thompson v. Ridgecrest, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanisha-thompson-v-ridgecrest-texapp-2014.