Tanisha Simon v. Rainey Washington
This text of Tanisha Simon v. Rainey Washington (Tanisha Simon v. Rainey Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed September 3, 2014.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00935-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF R.W.W., JR. AND J.R.W., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-94-11979
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Fillmore
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal indicating she is “not presently able to
afford the costs” of appeal. Appellant has not met the requirements of rule of appellate
procedure 20.1 for establishing indigence. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. Accordingly, we grant
appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 140935F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF R.W.W., JR. AND On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District J.R.W., CHILDREN Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-94-11979. No. 05-14-00935-CV Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore. Justices Evans and Lewis participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee Rainey Washington recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Tanisha Simon.
Judgment entered this 3rd day of September, 2014.
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tanisha Simon v. Rainey Washington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanisha-simon-v-rainey-washington-texapp-2014.