Tanis v. Tanis
164 A. 23, 112 N.J. Eq. 227
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Moore.
*232 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tanis v. Tanis, 164 A. 23, 112 N.J. Eq. 227 (N.J. 1933).
164 A. 23 (Tanis v. Tanis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bingenheimer v. Bingenheimer
66 A.2d 327 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)