Tanis v. Tanis

164 A. 23, 112 N.J. Eq. 227
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Moore.

*232 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tanis v. Tanis, 164 A. 23, 112 N.J. Eq. 227 (N.J. 1933).

164 A. 23 (Tanis v. Tanis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bingenheimer v. Bingenheimer
66 A.2d 327 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)