Tanis v. Tanis
164 A. 23, 112 N.J. Eq. 227
This text of 164 A. 23 (Tanis v. Tanis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tanis v. Tanis, 164 A. 23, 112 N.J. Eq. 227 (N.J. 1933).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Moore.
*232 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bingenheimer v. Bingenheimer
66 A.2d 327 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A. 23, 112 N.J. Eq. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanis-v-tanis-nj-1933.