Tania Georgina Mendoza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 20, 2011·No. 04-11-00136-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00136-CR

Tania Georgina MENDOZA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CR-0068W Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2011

DISMISSED

On March 1, 2011, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record on or before March 31, 2011. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not respond. The record does not contain a certification

that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the 04-11-00136-CR

record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant;

therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tania Georgina Mendoza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Tania Georgina Mendoza v. State (Tania Georgina Mendoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)