Tani v. Salomon Bros. Realty Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Tani v. Salomon Bros. Realty Corp.

155 F. App'x 715

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 1, 2005

DocketNo. 05-1711

StatusPublished

This text of 155 F. App'x 715 (Tani v. Salomon Bros. Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tani v. Salomon Bros. Realty Corp., 155 F. App'x 715 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kess Tani appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in his action in which he asserted violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and other claims arising from the Defendants’ initiation of foreclosure proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tani v. Lyman, No. CA-03-2566-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 29, 2004; filed Mar. 2, 2005 & entered Mar. 3, 2005; May 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kess Tani appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in his action in which he asserted violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and other claims arising from the Defendants’ initiation of foreclosure proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tani v. Lyman, No. CA-03-2566-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 29, 2004; filed Mar. 2, 2005 & entered Mar. 3, 2005; May 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 F. App'x 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tani-v-salomon-bros-realty-corp-ca4-2005.