Tani v. Cedar

Fourth Circuit

Tani v. Cedar

344 F. App'x 846

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 12, 2009·No. No. 08-2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[847]*847Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kesiena Tani appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tani v. Cedar, No. 1:07-cv-01924-CCB, 2008 WL 1990772 (D. Md. March 31, 2008) & (Aug. 8, 2008) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[847]*847Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kesiena Tani appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tani v. Cedar, No. 1:07-cv-01924-CCB, 2008 WL 1990772 (D. Md. March 31, 2008) & (Aug. 8, 2008) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Tani v. Cedar, 344 F. App'x 846 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

344 F. App'x 846 (Tani v. Cedar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related