Tangney v. City of New York
309 N.E.2d 868, 34 N.Y.2d 525, 354 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1855
This text of 309 N.E.2d 868 (Tangney v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tangney v. City of New York, 309 N.E.2d 868, 34 N.Y.2d 525, 354 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1855 (N.Y. 1974).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Our affirmance should not be construed as an approval of the abrupt curtailment of examination by plaintiff’s counsel and his proffers of proof.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
309 N.E.2d 868, 34 N.Y.2d 525, 354 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tangney-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1974.