Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TANGLE INC., Case No.23-cv-01196-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 9 v: PREJUDICE 10 ARITZIA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 57 11 Defendants. L 13 On October 18, 2023, the Court granted Defendants Aritzia, Inc., Aritzia LP, and United 14 || States of Aritzia, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss, without prejudice. (Dkt. 3 15 |} No. 56.) On November 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Intent Not to Amend its Complaint. a 16 ||} (Dkt. No. 57.)

17 The Court hereby DISMISSES, WITH PREJUDICE, Plaintiffs claims. See Edwards v. Z 18 || Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1064 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding proper procedure upon notice of 19 || intent not to amend is to enter judgment dismissing all claims with prejudice). The Clerk of Court 20 || shall close the file in this matter. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: November 9, 2023 / | / 23 \ Lt Lau 4 White JEFEREY §. WHIT 24 United St¢/es Distyfet Judge 25 ‘ 26 27 28