Tangemann v. City of New York
This text of 165 A.D. 896 (Tangemann v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think there was a question for the jury as to the negligence of the defendant and as to the freedom of the plaintiff from contributory negligence, and that, therefore, it was error to dismiss the complaint. It follows that the judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; McLaughlin and Dowling, JJ., dissented. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tangemann-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1914.