Tangelia Denise Jones v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 18, 2004
Docket01-04-01105-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Tangelia Denise Jones v. State (Tangelia Denise Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tangelia Denise Jones v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion




In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-04-01105-CR


TANGELIA DENISE JONES, Appellant


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 940005




MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of less than one gram of cocaine and, in accordance with a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court deferred adjudication and placed appellant on community supervision for three years and assessed a $500 fine. The State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt to which appellant pleaded true with a plea agreement of confinement in state jail for six months and a $500 fine. The trial court followed this agreement in pronouncing sentence. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

               Rule 25.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that, in a plea-bargained case in which the punishment assessed does not exceed the plea agreement, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after obtaining the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

               Appellant pleaded guilty to the charge; she entered into a punishment agreement with the State when she was adjudged guilty; and the trial court did not exceed that agreement at sentencing. This appeal is therefore limited by Rule 25.2(a). Comb v. State, 101 S.W.3d 724, 725-26 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.); see also Teel v. State, 104 S.W.3d 266, 267-68 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2003, no pet.). The trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal states that this is a plea-bargained case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

               Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Higley.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teel v. State
104 S.W.3d 266 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Armand Shabazz Comb v. State
101 S.W.3d 724 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tangelia Denise Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tangelia-denise-jones-v-state-texapp-2004.