Tanenbaum v. Lichtenstein
89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 307, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 315
This text of 89 S.E. 375 (Tanenbaum v. Lichtenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tanenbaum v. Lichtenstein, 89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 307, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 315 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The suit being for an amount less than $50, and an issue of fact being raised, an appeal to a jury in the justice court was the remedy, and not certiorari. The judge of the superior court did not err in dismissing the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 307, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanenbaum-v-lichtenstein-gactapp-1916.