Tanenbaum v. Herzfeld
241 A.D. 742
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In affirming we have taken into consideration the judgment roll in the brokerage action. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tanenbaum v. Herzfeld, 241 A.D. 742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
241 A.D. 742 (Tanenbaum v. Herzfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.