Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. Union Industrial Textil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. Union Industrial Textil

13 A.D.2d 640, 215 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11375

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 640 (Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. Union Industrial Textil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. Union Industrial Textil, 13 A.D.2d 640, 215 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before April 27, 1961, with notice of argument for May 9, 1961, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached, and on the further condition that if the attachment is not bonded by April 24, 1961, an order may be submitted for signature by the respondent, ex parte, further extending the Sheriff’s time within which to bring the action to reduce the levy to possession for a further period of 90 days. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before April 27, 1961, with notice of argument for May 9, 1961, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached, and on the further condition that if the attachment is not bonded by April 24, 1961, an order may be submitted for signature by the respondent, ex parte, further extending the Sheriff’s time within which to bring the action to reduce the levy to possession for a further period of 90 days. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 640, 215 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tanenbaum-textile-co-v-union-industrial-textil-nyappdiv-1961.