Tandy v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tandy v. Williams

834 S.W.2d 833, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 1992 WL 166089

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 21, 1992·No. No. 60635·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court in which it determined defendant to be the father of Sean Tandy, awarded Geraldine Johnson, mother of Sean, back support, awarded future child support, and attorney’s fees. The appeal was taken from the amounts of the back support award, the future support award, and the attorney’s fees. We find no error and the judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum supplementing this order. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court in which it determined defendant to be the father of Sean Tandy, awarded Geraldine Johnson, mother of Sean, back support, awarded future child support, and attorney’s fees. The appeal was taken from the amounts of the back support award, the future support award, and the attorney’s fees. We find no error and the judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum supplementing this order. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Tandy v. Williams, 834 S.W.2d 833, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 1992 WL 166089 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

834 S.W.2d 833 (Tandy v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.