Tandoc v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.

5 A.D.2d 857, 171 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6657
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1958·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The determination of the Commissioner of Licenses insofar as it finds petitioner guilty of the violation charged, is confirmed. However, considering the entire record, it may well be that the punishment imposed is excessive and an abuse of discretion (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1296, subd. 5-a). Petitioner, who has operated his business since 1952, has never heretofore been charged with any violation. The proceeding is remitted to the commissioner for a reconsideration of the order directing a suspension of petitioner’s license for 10 days and, as so modified, the determination is unanimously confirmed, without costs. Settle order.

Concur—-Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Frank and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tandoc v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., 5 A.D.2d 857, 171 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

5 A.D.2d 857 (Tandoc v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related