Tanase v. Commissioner of Welfare

334 A.2d 246, 168 Conn. 653
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 19, 1975·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File Typewritten Briefs and Appendices and for Order That Plaintiff Shall Not Have to Bear the Expense of Subsequent Printing” in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is granted to the extent that typewritten briefs and appendices may be submitted for use on argument on the condition that briefs and appendices complying with §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book be submitted thereafter for permanent record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tanase v. Commissioner of Welfare, 334 A.2d 246, 168 Conn. 653 (Colo. 1975).

334 A.2d 246 (Tanase v. Commissioner of Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.