Tananevicz v. Illinois

Supreme Court

Tananevicz v. Illinois

252 U.S. 568, 40 S. Ct. 346

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 15, 1920

DocketNo. 312

StatusPublished

This text of 252 U.S. 568 (Tananevicz v. Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tananevicz v. Illinois, 252 U.S. 568, 40 S. Ct. 346 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334; St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shepherd, [569]*569240 U. S. 240, 241; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. (3) Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726.

Mr. Emory J. Smith tor plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward J. Brundage and Mr. Edward C. Fitch for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334; St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shepherd, [569]*569240 U. S. 240, 241; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. (3) Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726.

Mr. Emory J. Smith tor plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward J. Brundage and Mr. Edward C. Fitch for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 U.S. 568, 40 S. Ct. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tananevicz-v-illinois-scotus-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack