Tamuno Ifiesimama and Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. HaileWonglewit K. Alemu

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 9, 2016·No. 01-15-00829-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00829-CV Style: Tamuno Ifiesimama & Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. Haile & Wonglewit K. Alamu

Date motion filed*: February 1, 2016 Type of motion: Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 1, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: February 1, 2016 Date Requested: N/A (no date requested)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:

 Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s motion to re-calendar the briefing period to commence from the date of the filing of the supplemental reporter’s record on the hearing for his motion for new trial in this Court, construed as an indefinite extension request, is denied without prejudice to refiling an extension request that includes a specific length of the extension sought. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(B).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually

Date: February 9, 2016

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tamuno Ifiesimama and Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. HaileWonglewit K. Alemu, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Tamuno Ifiesimama and Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. HaileWonglewit K. Alemu (Tamuno Ifiesimama and Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. HaileWonglewit K. Alemu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.