Tamuno Ifiesimama and Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. HaileWonglewit K. Alemu
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00829-CV Style: Tamuno Ifiesimama & Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. Haile & Wonglewit K. Alamu
Date motion filed*: February 1, 2016 Type of motion: Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief
Is appeal accelerated? No.
If motion to extend time:
Original due date: February 1, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: February 1, 2016 Date Requested: N/A (no date requested)
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due:
Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s motion to re-calendar the briefing period to commence from the date of the filing of the supplemental reporter’s record on the hearing for his motion for new trial in this Court, construed as an indefinite extension request, is denied without prejudice to refiling an extension request that includes a specific length of the extension sought. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(B).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Acting individually
Date: February 9, 2016
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tamuno Ifiesimama and Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. HaileWonglewit K. Alemu (Tamuno Ifiesimama and Tamunnoibuomi Ifiesimama v. Daniel A. HaileWonglewit K. Alemu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.