Tams v. Abrams
185 A. 521, 120 N.J. Eq. 253, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 698
Opinion
The pleadings and proofs in this case have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the vice-chancellor are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tams v. Abrams, 185 A. 521, 120 N.J. Eq. 253, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 698 (N.J. 1936).
185 A. 521 (Tams v. Abrams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kugler v. Romain
266 A.2d 144 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Dover Shopping Center, Inc. v. Cushman's Sons, Inc.
164 A.2d 785 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Pergament v. Frazer
93 F. Supp. 13 (E.D. Michigan, 1950)
Rovner v. Atlantic Realty Service, Inc.
42 A.2d 386 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1945)