Tamra Zmeskal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 4, 2010·No. 13-09-00367-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00367-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

TAMRA ZMESKAL, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Tamra Zmeskal, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX . R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 4th day of March, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tamra Zmeskal v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Tamra Zmeskal v. State (Tamra Zmeskal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.