Tampubolon v. Holder

386 F. App'x 709
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tampubolon v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 610 F.3d 1056
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 9, 2010·No. 08-70089·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ricson Tampubolon, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Reyes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 592, 595 (9th Cir.2004), and we review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly concluded that Tam-pubolon failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, because his attorney’s decision to withdraw his application for asylum constituted a tactical decision. See Magallanes-Damian v. INS, 783 F.2d 931, 934 (9th Cir.1986). Tampubolon has not established prejudice to support his due process claim. See Lata, 204 F.3d at 1246.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tampubolon v. Holder, 386 F. App'x 709 (9th Cir. 2010).

386 F. App'x 709 (Tampubolon v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related