Tampa Water Works Co. v. City of Tampa

47 Fla. 338
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 15, 1904·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— On the appeal of this case heretofore prosecuted it was considered that the demurrer to the bill herein should be sustained, and the injunctions dissolved, but the cause was remanded in order that the complainant might have leave to amend its bill. This it failed to do upon the opportunity being afforded it, and thereupon the court dismissed the bill.

No new questions are presented on this appeal that were not fully considered and settled adversely to the Water Works Company on the former appeal (City of Tampa v. Tampa Water Works Company, 45 Fla. 600, 34 South. Rep. 631, decided April 28, 1903), and the decrees appealed from must be affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., Carter, Cockrell and Whiteield, JJ , concur.

ShackleEord, J.. disqualified; Hocker, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tampa Water Works Co. v. City of Tampa, 47 Fla. 338 (Fla. 1904).

47 Fla. 338 (Tampa Water Works Co. v. City of Tampa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Power Corporation v. Pinellas Utility Bd.
40 So. 2d 350 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
Miami Bridge Company v. State R. R. Commission
20 So. 2d 356 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Parsons v. City of Galveston
84 S.W.2d 996 (Texas Supreme Court, 1935)
Gainesville Gas & Electric Power Co. v. City of Gainesville
63 Fla. 425 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1912)