Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. v. Simmons

148 So. 518, 110 Fla. 255
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 17, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. See Goulding Fert. Co. v. Watts, 63 Fla. 155, 58 Sou. Rep. 362.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. v. Simmons, 148 So. 518, 110 Fla. 255 (Fla. 1933).

148 So. 518 (Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goulding Fertilizer Co. v. Watts
63 Fla. 155 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1912)