Tampa Electric Co. v. McCulloch

156 So. 259, 115 Fla. 680, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1666
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 3, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment awarding damages for personal injuries received at a grade crossing when a street car collided with an automobile in which plaintiff was riding. Negligence of the *681 defendant company is alleged in the operation of the street car, in excessive speed and in failing to give warning of the approach of the street car. Trial was had on a plea; of not guilty and of contributory negligence. There was evidence legally sufficient to support a finding of negligence of the defendant’s employee in not giving warning of the approach of the car under circumstances of traffic and obstruction of vision near the crossing which required careful attention and the giving of timely warning signals by the motorman; and similarly as to the plaintiff who was driving the automobile; but, under the statutes, contributory negligence merely reduces the amount of.the recovery, and as there is no contention that the damages were not duly apportioned, but merely that a new trial should have been granted on grounds going to the lack of negligence on the part of the defendant, no material error is made to appear.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tampa Electric Co. v. McCulloch, 156 So. 259, 115 Fla. 680, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1666 (Fla. 1934).

156 So. 259 (Tampa Electric Co. v. McCulloch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powell v. Etter Powell v. Etter
10 So. 2d 441 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Powell v. Gary
200 So. 854 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Powell v. Jackson Grain Co.
184 So. 492 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)