Tammy Taylor Nails, Inc. v. Viljoen

Opinion

I 2 3 4 5 8 9 || TAMMY TAYLOR NAILS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-0624-BAS-DTF 10 Plaintft, | ORDER AMENDING REQUEST 11 V. FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 12 || MELANY VILJOEN, PEET VILJOEN, (ECE No. 21) B TAMMY TAYLOR GLOBAL FRANCHISING, and DOES 1 14 || THROUGH 10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Last week, this Court issued an Order Requesting Supplemental Briefing regarding 18 ||service of process and specific jurisdiction. Yesterday, an en banc panel of the Ninth 19 || Circuit issued a decision in Briskin v. Shopify, Inc., No. 22-15815, 2025 WL 1154075 (9th 20 || Cir. Apr. 21, 2025), which deals with issues of specific jurisdiction. Accordingly, this Court 21 ||} AMENDS its prior Order and requests Plaintiff, to the degree Plaintiff believes Shopify 22 applies, to address Shopify in its supplemental briefing. (ECF No. 21.) 24 25 || DATED: April 22, 2025 (yatta Bahar 26 Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge 44 United States District Court

28 4.