Tammy Elliott Cocke v. Simon Russell Elliott Dolphus Jack Brown Claire Clode-Baker Elaine Bulger Brown Fred Am Rhein Vantex Service Corporation Active Deployment Systems, Inc. Pourquoi Pas, Inc. And RonJon Rentals, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 27, 2013
Docket03-12-00667-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Tammy Elliott Cocke v. Simon Russell Elliott Dolphus Jack Brown Claire Clode-Baker Elaine Bulger Brown Fred Am Rhein Vantex Service Corporation Active Deployment Systems, Inc. Pourquoi Pas, Inc. And RonJon Rentals, Inc. (Tammy Elliott Cocke v. Simon Russell Elliott Dolphus Jack Brown Claire Clode-Baker Elaine Bulger Brown Fred Am Rhein Vantex Service Corporation Active Deployment Systems, Inc. Pourquoi Pas, Inc. And RonJon Rentals, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tammy Elliott Cocke v. Simon Russell Elliott Dolphus Jack Brown Claire Clode-Baker Elaine Bulger Brown Fred Am Rhein Vantex Service Corporation Active Deployment Systems, Inc. Pourquoi Pas, Inc. And RonJon Rentals, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 27, 2013

NO. 03-12-00667-CV

Tammy Elliott Cocke, Appellant

v.

Simon Russell Elliott; Dolphus Jack Brown; Claire Clode-Baker; Elaine Bulger Brown; Fred Am Rhein; Vantex Service Corporation; Active Deployment Systems, Inc.; Pourquoi Pas, Inc.; and RonJon Rentals, Inc., Appellees

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the district court’s

judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the

district court is in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tammy Elliott Cocke v. Simon Russell Elliott Dolphus Jack Brown Claire Clode-Baker Elaine Bulger Brown Fred Am Rhein Vantex Service Corporation Active Deployment Systems, Inc. Pourquoi Pas, Inc. And RonJon Rentals, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tammy-elliott-cocke-v-simon-russell-elliott-dolphus-jack-brown-claire-texapp-2013.