Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus
This text of Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus (Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00192-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
TAMMARA MAGEE LOFTUS, Appellant,
v.
PATRICK DAVIS LOFTUS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 247th District Court of Harris County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 2, 2011. On
September 29, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been
timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of
receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response
has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 27th day of October, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tammara-magee-loftus-v-patrick-davis-loftus-texapp-2011.