Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 2011·No. 13-11-00192-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00192-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

TAMMARA MAGEE LOFTUS, Appellant,

v.

PATRICK DAVIS LOFTUS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 247th District Court of Harris County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 2, 2011. On

September 29, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been

timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 27th day of October, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus (Tammara Magee Loftus v. Patrick Davis Loftus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.