Tamm v. Burns
597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 455
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 468, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had adequately alleged facts amounting to a substantial claim of a violation of his constitutional right against taking of his property without just compensation, so as to avoid the bar of sovereign immunity?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tamm v. Burns, 597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 455 (Colo. 1991).
597 A.2d 340 (Tamm v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tamm v. Burns
610 A.2d 590 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)