Tamm v. Burns

597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 455
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 19, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 468, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had adequately alleged facts amounting to a substantial claim of a violation of his constitutional right against taking of his property without just compensation, so as to avoid the bar of sovereign immunity?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tamm v. Burns, 597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 455 (Colo. 1991).

597 A.2d 340 (Tamm v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tamm v. Burns
610 A.2d 590 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)