Tamm v. Burns
This text of 597 A.2d 340 (Tamm v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 468, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had adequately alleged facts amounting to a substantial claim of a violation of his constitutional right against taking of his property without just compensation, so as to avoid the bar of sovereign immunity?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 A.2d 340, 220 Conn. 914, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamm-v-burns-conn-1991.