Tamisier v. Cassard

New York Supreme Court

Tamisier v. Cassard

17 Abb. Pr. 187

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1863

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Abb. Pr. 187 (Tamisier v. Cassard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tamisier v. Cassard, 17 Abb. Pr. 187 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Leonard, J.

—The Code directs that actions shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. (§ 111.)

The answer here alleges that one Victor Giraudy is the real party in interest in this action.

The plaintiff now moves for judgment, on account of the frivolousness of the answer.

The section above referred to makes it necessary that the' plaintiff should be the real party in' interest.

I cannot consider such an issue as frivolous. The plain direction of the Code must be disregarded, before the issue can be considered immaterial.

The motion is denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leonard, J.

—The Code directs that actions shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. (§ 111.)

The answer here alleges that one Victor Giraudy is the real party in interest in this action.

The plaintiff now moves for judgment, on account of the frivolousness of the answer.

The section above referred to makes it necessary that the' plaintiff should be the real party in' interest.

I cannot consider such an issue as frivolous. The plain direction of the Code must be disregarded, before the issue can be considered immaterial.

The motion is denied, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Abb. Pr. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamisier-v-cassard-nysupct-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack