Tamika Seay v. Ashley Stinson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 25, 2022
DocketA22D0280
StatusPublished

This text of Tamika Seay v. Ashley Stinson (Tamika Seay v. Ashley Stinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamika Seay v. Ashley Stinson, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 25, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0280. TAMIKA SEAY v. ASHLEY STINSON.

B. T. was born in 2017 and came into the custody of DFCS the following year. He was placed with his maternal grandmother, Tamika Seay, and her husband, Melvin Seay. When a home evaluation turned up a history of domestic violence between the Seays, the juvenile court entered an order removing B. T. from their home. Nearly three years later, the Seays filed an application for discretionary appeal, which we dismissed as untimely. See Case No. A22D0111 (Nov. 3, 2021). Meanwhile, in November 2019, the Seays filed a petition in superior court to adopt B. T. The superior court denied the petition, and the Seays appealed to this Court. We affirmed in an unpublished opinion. See Case No. A20A1237 (Sept. 1, 2020). The Seays filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court, which was denied. See Case No. S21C0265 (May 17, 2021).1 Back in the superior court, Tamika Seay filed a habeas corpus petition against Ashley Stinson, B. T.’s guardian ad litem, alleging that she (Seay) was the child’s rightful legal custodian and demanding the child’s return. The superior court granted Stinson’s motion to dismiss, and Seay once more seeks discretionary review in this Court. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases involving habeas corpus. See Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par.

1 After remittitur returned to the superior court, the Seays filed a second application for discretionary appeal in this Court, which they subsequently withdrew. See Case No. A22D0020 (Aug. 30, 2021). III (4). Accordingly, we hereby TRANSFER this application to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/25/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tamika Seay v. Ashley Stinson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamika-seay-v-ashley-stinson-gactapp-2022.