Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 2015·No. 151134·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 23, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

151134 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

TAMIKA HARRELL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151134 COA: 318744 Wayne CC: 12-003939-NF

TITAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff, who was driving an uninsured vehicle titled in the name of her husband, is an “owner” under MCL 500.3101(2)(k)(i). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2015

s0916

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company, (Mich. 2015).

Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company (Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.