Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company

DecidedSeptember 23, 2015

Docket151134

StatusPublished

This text of Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company (Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company, (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 23, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 151134 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein, TAMIKA HARRELL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 151134 COA: 318744 Wayne CC: 12-003939-NF TITAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff, who was driving an uninsured vehicle titled in the name of her husband, is an “owner” under MCL 500.3101(2)(k)(i). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 23, 2015 s0916 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 23, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 151134 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein, TAMIKA HARRELL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 151134 COA: 318744 Wayne CC: 12-003939-NF TITAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff, who was driving an uninsured vehicle titled in the name of her husband, is an “owner” under MCL 500.3101(2)(k)(i). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 23, 2015 s0916 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Tamika Harrell v. Titan Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamika-harrell-v-titan-indemnity-company-mich-2015.