Tamie Miller v. Parks at Sycamore School Apartments
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-12-00282-CV
|
Tamie Miller |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Parks at Sycamore School Apartments |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM County Court at Law No. 1 OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On February 2, 2013, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 7, 2013
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tamie Miller v. Parks at Sycamore School Apartments (Tamie Miller v. Parks at Sycamore School Apartments) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.