Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Tami Tal Biton v. Serour

Tami Tal Biton v. Serour

2016 NY Slip Op 7115, 144 A.D.3d 404, 39 N.Y.S.3d 781
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 1, 2016
Docket2007 161689/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 7115 (Tami Tal Biton v. Serour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tami Tal Biton v. Serour, 2016 NY Slip Op 7115, 144 A.D.3d 404, 39 N.Y.S.3d 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered March 9, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, restricted infant plaintiff’s deposition testimony to the issue of damages, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The compliance order on appeal is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice, nor did defendants make a motion seeking leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Diaz v New York Mercantile Exch., 1 AD3d 242, 243 [1st Dept 2003]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diaz v. New York Mercantile Exchange
1 A.D.3d 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 NY Slip Op 7115, 144 A.D.3d 404, 39 N.Y.S.3d 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tami-tal-biton-v-serour-nyappdiv-2016.