Tamez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Tamez v. State

697 So. 2d 496, 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 193, 1997 WL 193773

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 18, 1997

DocketCR-95-564

StatusPublished

This text of 697 So. 2d 496 (Tamez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tamez v. State, 697 So. 2d 496, 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 193, 1997 WL 193773 (Ala. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

[497]*497 On Return to Remand

McMillan, judge.

This cause was remanded in order for the trial court to impose the sentence mandated by § 13A-5-9(b)(3), Code of Alabama 1975, with regard to the appellant’s conviction of trafficking in marijuana. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that, on remand, the appellant, who has five prior felony convictions, was sentenced as an habitual felony offender to life imprisonment. In addition, the court again ordered the appellant to pay a $25,000 fine, to pay $100 to the crime victims compensation fund, to pay a $1,000 drug demand reduction assessment, and to pay an attorney fee and court costs.

The sentence imposed by the trial court is proper; it is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[497]*497 On Return to Remand

McMillan, judge.

This cause was remanded in order for the trial court to impose the sentence mandated by § 13A-5-9(b)(3), Code of Alabama 1975, with regard to the appellant’s conviction of trafficking in marijuana. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that, on remand, the appellant, who has five prior felony convictions, was sentenced as an habitual felony offender to life imprisonment. In addition, the court again ordered the appellant to pay a $25,000 fine, to pay $100 to the crime victims compensation fund, to pay a $1,000 drug demand reduction assessment, and to pay an attorney fee and court costs.

The sentence imposed by the trial court is proper; it is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 So. 2d 496, 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 193, 1997 WL 193773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamez-v-state-alacrimapp-1997.