Tamer v. State

510 So. 2d 933, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1532, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9017
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tamer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 473
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1987·No. No. 86-1891·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Theodore Tamer seeks the reversal of his conviction of two counts of [934]*934arson, on a theory of aiding and abetting.1 He contends there was insufficient evidence to prove he either intended that arson be committed or took any action to assist another in the actual commission of the charged arson offenses. Consequently, he argues, the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal as to the arson offenses. Appellant further contends that improper closing argument by the state deprived him of his right to a fair trial, and the trial court’s allowing the state to introduce “collateral crime” evidence without the establishment of a proper predicate therefor constituted reversible error.

Having carefully considered each of the points raised on appeal, we conclude that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, the verdict is supported by the evidence, and the several rulings of the trial court challenged by appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute harmful error. See Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210, 212 (Fla.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 920, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984); Smith v. State, 424 So.2d 726, 731 (Fla. 1982), cert denied, 462 U.S. 1145,103 S.Ct. 3129, 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331, 335 (Fla.1978); Weeks v. State, 492 So.2d 719, 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Blair v. State, 481 So.2d 1279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); T.G.B. v. State, 405 So.2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Therefore the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tamer v. State, 510 So. 2d 933, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1532, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

510 So. 2d 933 (Tamer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Florida
462 U.S. 1145 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Heiney v. Florida
469 U.S. 920 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Clark v. State
363 So. 2d 331 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Weeks v. State
492 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Heiney v. State
447 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
State v. Tamer
449 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Smith v. State
424 So. 2d 726 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
T.G.B. v. State
405 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Tamer
475 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Blair v. State
481 So. 2d 1279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)