Tameka Ross v. Lilac Assisted Living Eagle, Spring and Misha Anup

Opinion

Opinion issued December 31, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

her appeal because the order appealed from was not a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order. Appellant was further directed to, within ten days of the date of the Court’s notice, file a written response, with citation to law and the record, demonstrating that the Court had appellate jurisdiction over the appeal.

In response to the Court’s notice, on December 18, 2024, appellant filed a motion to “withdraw her appeal” pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a) (permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion of appellant). Appellant’s motion requested that the Court grant her motion and withdraw her appeal.

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion includes a certificate of conference stating that appellees do not oppose the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Gunn.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-24-00785-CV ——————————— TAMEKA ROSS, Appellant V. LILAC ASSISTED LIVING LLC AND DHARMISHA ANUP, Appellees On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2023-47268 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Tameka Ross, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s September 17, 2024 “Order on [Appellees, Lilac Assisted Living LLC and Dharmisha Anup’s] Special Exceptions to [Appellant’s] Second Amended Petition.” On November 14, 2024, the Court notified appellant that we lacked jurisdiction over