Tamburrino v. Jayen Building Corp.

233 A.D. 868

This text of 233 A.D. 868 (Tamburrino v. Jayen Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamburrino v. Jayen Building Corp., 233 A.D. 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, [869]*869with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal upon the ground that there is no proof in the case that the general contractor knew or had reason to know that the place where the accident happened was to be used for the purpose for which it was used.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamburrino-v-jayen-building-corp-nyappdiv-1931.