Tambria Lee v. Daniel Leon Peterson and Morgan Peterson, Jr.
This text of Tambria Lee v. Daniel Leon Peterson and Morgan Peterson, Jr. (Tambria Lee v. Daniel Leon Peterson and Morgan Peterson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 18, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00646-CV ——————————— TAMBRIA LEE, Appellant V. DANIEL LEON PETERSON AND MORGAN PETERSON, JR., Appellees
On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 53927
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Tambria Lee, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding
Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and 1 Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138
(Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). Further,
appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the
clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal
was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P.
5; 42.3(b).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of
prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tambria Lee v. Daniel Leon Peterson and Morgan Peterson, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tambria-lee-v-daniel-leon-peterson-and-morgan-pete-texapp-2014.