Tamayo v. Sillogy

149 F.3d 1165, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7290, 1998 WL 169252
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 1998
Docket97-3418
StatusPublished

This text of 149 F.3d 1165 (Tamayo v. Sillogy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamayo v. Sillogy, 149 F.3d 1165, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7290, 1998 WL 169252 (3d Cir. 1998).

Opinion

149 F.3d 1165

Luis Tamayo
v.
C. Sillogy, Paralegal, Loretto Institution, Carlos Ortiz,
N.E. Reg. Director, Khurshid Yusuff, Warden,
Loretto Institution, Gral. Counsel Off.,
Washington, DC

NO. 97-3418

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

March 23, 1998

Appeal From: W.D.Pa. ,No.95cv00259j ,

Smith,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Potter v. Robbins
290 S.W. 396 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 F.3d 1165, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7290, 1998 WL 169252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamayo-v-sillogy-ca3-1998.