Tamayo v. Ramirez

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: November 19, 2019
• Docket: 1:19-cv-10660
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT werner eee ee eee eee eee ee ee eee ELECTRONICALLY FILED EUGENIA TAMAYO, DOC #:_, A a DATE FILED:| /—]| ~~) | Plaintiff(s), 4

-against- 19-CV-10660 (LAK) LUIS ALEXIS RAMIREZ, Defendant(s) tt rt tere er er □□ er er re ee ee te HX

ORDER

A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Oo The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). Oo The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Oo The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. oO The timely removal of the action from state court. Absent the filing, on or before November 26, 2019, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be remanded. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2019 ‘

Lewis A. Kapla United States District (dge