Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Tamayo v. Martinez, No. Cv94-0541590s (Feb. 15, 1995)

Tamayo v. Martinez, No. Cv94-0541590s (Feb. 15, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1406
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1995
DocketNo. CV94-0541590S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1406 (Tamayo v. Martinez, No. Cv94-0541590s (Feb. 15, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamayo v. Martinez, No. Cv94-0541590s (Feb. 15, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1406 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE THE SIXTH COUNT OFTHE COMPLAINT DATED DECEMBER 7, 1994 The plaintiff has failed to allege with sufficient particularity conduct which is more than negligence, more than gross negligence. Shieman v. Lafayette Bank Trust Co.,4 Conn. App. 39, 45-46; Bordonaro v. Senk, 109 Conn. 428, 431;Brock v. Waldron, 127 Conn. 79; Gaudet v. Ziobrun, 7 CSCR 752;Foxworth v. Juliano, Jr.. CV 93 052 42 37 S (November 3, 1993) (Sheldon, J.).

The Motion to Strike is granted.

Frances Allen State Judge Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bordonaro v. Senk
147 A. 136 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1929)
Brock v. Waldron
14 A.2d 713 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1940)
Gaudet v. Ziobran, No. 61126 (Jun. 10, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 5320 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)
Sheiman v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.
492 A.2d 219 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamayo-v-martinez-no-cv94-0541590s-feb-15-1995-connsuperct-1995.