Tamayo v. Martinez, No. Cv94-0541590s (Feb. 15, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1406
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided February 15, 1995·No. No. CV94-0541590S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE THE SIXTH COUNT OFTHE COMPLAINT DATED DECEMBER 7, 1994 The plaintiff has failed to allege with sufficient particularity conduct which is more than negligence, more than gross negligence. Shieman v. Lafayette Bank Trust Co.,4 Conn. App. 39, 45-46; Bordonaro v. Senk, 109 Conn. 428, 431;Brock v. Waldron, 127 Conn. 79; Gaudet v. Ziobrun, 7 CSCR 752;Foxworth v. Juliano, Jr.. CV 93 052 42 37 S (November 3, 1993) (Sheldon, J.).

The Motion to Strike is granted.

Frances Allen State Judge Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tamayo v. Martinez, No. Cv94-0541590s (Feb. 15, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1406 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1406 (Tamayo v. Martinez, No. Cv94-0541590s (Feb. 15, 1995)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bordonaro v. Senk
147 A. 136 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1929)
Brock v. Waldron
14 A.2d 713 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1940)
Gaudet v. Ziobran, No. 61126 (Jun. 10, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 5320 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)
Sheiman v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.
492 A.2d 219 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)