Tamara Lynn Ramaker v. Jeanette Abbe, Gary Hobbs, Denise Lackey, Shelly Mattson, Stacy McCoy, Anita Paniagua and Amber Ross

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 18, 2013
Docket03-10-00713-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Tamara Lynn Ramaker v. Jeanette Abbe, Gary Hobbs, Denise Lackey, Shelly Mattson, Stacy McCoy, Anita Paniagua and Amber Ross (Tamara Lynn Ramaker v. Jeanette Abbe, Gary Hobbs, Denise Lackey, Shelly Mattson, Stacy McCoy, Anita Paniagua and Amber Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tamara Lynn Ramaker v. Jeanette Abbe, Gary Hobbs, Denise Lackey, Shelly Mattson, Stacy McCoy, Anita Paniagua and Amber Ross, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 18, 2013

NO. 03-10-00713-CV

Tamara Lynn Ramaker, Appellant

v.

Jeanette Abbe, Gary Hobbs, Denise Lackey, Shelly Mattson, Stacy McCoy, Anita Paniagua and Amber Ross, Appellees

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND ROSE AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment

EXCEPT for the portion of the judgment finding that Tamara Lynn Ramaker take nothing on

her claim that Amber Ross breached the Riding Instructor Agreement and the award of

attorney’s fees. IT IS THEREFORE ordered that the portion of the trial court’s judgment

finding that Tamara Lynn Ramaker take nothing on her claim that Amber Ross breached the

Riding Instructor Agreement and the award of attorney’s fees are reversed, and those issues are

remanded for further proceedings. However, we affirm the trial court’s judgment with respect to

claims concerning the Boarding Contract. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellees pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below, and that this decision be

certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tamara Lynn Ramaker v. Jeanette Abbe, Gary Hobbs, Denise Lackey, Shelly Mattson, Stacy McCoy, Anita Paniagua and Amber Ross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamara-lynn-ramaker-v-jeanette-abbe-gary-hobbs-den-texapp-2013.