Tamara Filas v. Daryle Salisbury
This text of Tamara Filas v. Daryle Salisbury (Tamara Filas v. Daryle Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 12, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
156055 & (68)(69)(75)(76) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, TAMARA FILAS, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 156055 COA: 331458 Wayne CC: 15-002158-NM DARYLE SALISBURY, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for stay and for peremptory reversal are DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 12, 2017 p0711 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tamara Filas v. Daryle Salisbury, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamara-filas-v-daryle-salisbury-mich-2017.