Tamara Angela Griffin v. James Henry Thomas, Sr.
This text of Tamara Angela Griffin v. James Henry Thomas, Sr. (Tamara Angela Griffin v. James Henry Thomas, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
TAMARA ANGELA GRIFFIN, § No. 08-24-00003-CV
Appellant, § Appeal from the
v. § 383rd Judicial District Court
JAMES HENRY THOMAS, SR., § of El Paso County, Texas
Appellee. § (TC# 2020DCM1006)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Concluding that Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we
dismiss the appeal.
A party perfects a civil appeal by timely filing a notice of appeal within 30 days after a
final judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. A timely post-trial motion, such as a motion for
new trial, extends the timeline for perfecting an appeal to 90 days after the judgment is signed.
TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). A motion for new trial is timely filed within 90 days of the date the
judgment is signed. TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a).
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on January 12, 2024, attempting to appeal the trial court’s
final judgment signed on October 12, 2023. The docketing certificate indicates that Appellant filed an untimely motion for new trial on January 11, 2024. Because the motion for new trial was
untimely, the deadline for filing Appellant’s notice of appeal was not extended and the notice was
due on or before November 11, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1
On January 12, 2024, the Clerk of this Court sent Appellant a letter indicating that the
appeal was not timely perfected. The letter gave notice of our intent to dismiss the appeal for want
of jurisdiction, after ten days, unless grounds were shown for the Court to continue the appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, we find that
Appellant failed to perfect her appeal because she filed the notice of appeal outside of the
applicable time limit. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 42.3(a),
(c), 43.2(f).
JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice
January 30, 2024
Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tamara Angela Griffin v. James Henry Thomas, Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamara-angela-griffin-v-james-henry-thomas-sr-texapp-2024.