Tamara Aissa Perez Morales v. Noel Guillermo Cruz
This text of Tamara Aissa Perez Morales v. Noel Guillermo Cruz (Tamara Aissa Perez Morales v. Noel Guillermo Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 13, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1587 Lower Tribunal No. 17-11780 ________________
Tamara Aissa Perez Morales, Appellant,
vs.
Noel Guillermo Cruz, Appellee.
An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia del Rey, Judge.
JPA Law Firm, PLLC, and Jesse Philippe-Auguste, for appellant.
Grass, Reyes & Associates, and Katushca M. Grass, for appellee.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.
MILLER, J. In this appeal, the mother challenges an order granting the father’s
emergency petition to temporarily relocate to Puerto Rico with the minor
children. Although she originally informally agreed to the relocation, the
mother now asserts the underlying petition was defective and the corollary
order fails for a lack of competent, substantial evidence. As to the former
contention, the undeveloped record before us does not establish that the
claimed deficiencies were properly preserved for appellate review. See
Hoirup v. Hoirup, 862 So. 2d 780, 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Esaw v. Esaw,
965 So. 2d 1261, 1267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). As to the latter, we conclude
the comprehensive findings rendered in the challenged order are legally
sufficient and well-supported by the testimony and exhibits adduced at the
hearing. 1 See Sanabria v. Sanabria, 271 So. 3d 1101, 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA
2019); Ryan v. Ryan, 252 So. 3d 272, 273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018); Norris v.
Heckerman, 972 So. 2d 1098, 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, we
affirm the order under review.
Affirmed.
1 We summarily conclude the challenged text messages were properly admitted under the hearsay exception for a “party’s own statement in . . . an individual . . . capacity.” § 90.803(18)(a), Fla. Stat. (2023).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tamara Aissa Perez Morales v. Noel Guillermo Cruz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tamara-aissa-perez-morales-v-noel-guillermo-cruz-fladistctapp-2024.